Stanislas de Guaita & Joséphin Péledan at the Threshold of the
Mysteries
So far we have been largely
concerned with the life and work of Gérard Encausse, or ‘Papus’, but remarkable though his influence was, he
was not the only young man to cause a stir in esoteric circles in late 19th
century Paris. Another mover and shaker was a very different individual, by the
name of Stanislas de Guaita, a descendant of minor Italian nobility with
considerable literary abilities and inherited wealth.
Once again the memoirs of Émile-Victoire Michelet provide us with an
introduction. And while he had not been too impressed at his first encounter
with Papus – the stumbling orator at the Theosophical Society meeting – his
impressions of Stanislas could hardly have been greater. Indeed so impressed
was he that in the end he ranked him with such pioneers as Eliphas Levi, Hoene Wronski and Fabre-d’Olivet.
But at the time of their first meeting,
in 1880, when both had not long turned 20, their ambitions lay in the direction
of literature rather than occultism. Both were budding poets and indeed in this
same year Stanislas saw publication of his first slim book of poetry Oiseaux
de Passage (Birds of Passage). Apart from a brief reference to Alchemy
there was no hint esoteric interest in it, although next to literature his
burning interest at school and college had been chemistry, with a somewhat
darker leaning toward toxicology.
It may have been something a little
more than youthful romanticism that led Michelet to fantasise about some deeper
significance to their meeting. In that he, a young Breton poet from the west,
should be meeting up with one from Lorraine in the east, on the ‘mount of St.
Geneviève’ in Paris. That is to say a promontory on the left bank of the Seine
that has the Pantheon, the resting place of the nation’s great at its summit. More
prosaically their meeting was in a Latin quarter café, the introductions being
effected by Maurice Barrès, a former schoolfriend of Stanislas and fellow
literary hopeful.
But it was not a pairing of these
two in the field of literature that was to come to pass. Stanislas certainly
attained great stature in the literature of French occultism but only after
coming under the influence of another young man who had recently arrived in
Paris – come up from the south. His name was Joséphin Péledan, eager to make
his way in the artistic world, scraping a living as a bank clerk while trying
to establish a reputation as an art critic.
Back home his elder brother Adrian,
a member of a Rosicrucian society in Toulouse, had been deeply committed to
occultism. Ten years older than Joséphin, he was a qualified doctor and one of
the first to practice homeopathy. Unfortunately he was not to live much longer.
In 1885 a pharmacist’s error caused his death by strychnine poisoning but not before
young Joséphin had found sudden fame – not as an art critic but as a novelist.
In 1884, his self-published Le Vice suprême took the book trade by
storm. Far from being a salacious pot boiler as its title might suggest it was
a critique of modern society with leading characters accomplished in the
esoteric arts. Indeed, along with a series of similar novels, Péladan ‘spiritual
adventurer and lover of life’ as a blurb described him, followed up with a
collection of teachings Comment on devient Mage (How to become a Magus), although it had nowhere
the impact of the novel.
When Stanislas de Guaita read Le
Vice suprême he was bowled over by it. We are fortunate that a series of
letters has survived from him to Péledan. Quoting from the first, sent on
November 3rd 1884 ....I have just read your fine book ‘Le Vice
suprême’ – and have re-read it several times for it is one that can only
enthuse or horrify a reader – for it appears to be either a masterpiece or a
hoax. I dare to admit that I am one who
has been enthused by it......It seems to me that the Kabbala is a superb
science with grandiose dogmas and incomparable myths. I consider the abbé
Constant a great man and the mockery to which he is subjected make him all the
greater in my eyes.
Indeed
Stanislas was inspired to devote the rest of his life to an analysis of occult
theory and practice in a series of books. The first, Essais de Sciences
maudites (Essays on Forbidden
Sciences) in 1886, was eventually extended to three times its length and renamed
Au Seuil du Mystère (At the Threshold of the Mysteries). It was the
forerunner for Le Serpent de La Genèse (The Serpent of Genesis) planned
to be published in three volumes as Le
Temple de Satan, (The Temple of Satan) in 1891; La Clef de la Magie
Noire (The Key to Black Magic) in 1897,
and Le Problème du Mal (The Problem of Evil) that unfortunately was
never finished, in fact barely started. He died at the age of 36 at the end of
1897 probably hastened by narcotics
taken as a relief from persistent migraines.
The writing of these books was not
his only legacy however. Along with Péladan, and later incorporating Papus, he
founded the Ordre Kabbalistique de la Rose+Croix (Kabbalistic Order of
the Rose Cross). He also amassed a remarkable occult library of over 2000
volumes that he made available to associates and friends in Paris, along with use
of his extensive apartment for meetings and practical occult work.
In the meantime Joséphin Péladan,
with a separate agenda and eventually separate Kabbalistic Order made great
inroads into French and European artistic culture with a series of projects embodying
the Symbolist movement in art, music and theatre.
The story of their achievements, and
vicissitudes, was instructive at the time and remains so, not only as bench
marks of what can be achieved, but also as warning signals on what it may be best
to avoid. As with Papus and his friends, the ideals and inexperience of youth
(most were under 30) were both advantages and disadvantages in their voyages of
discovery.
No comments:
Post a Comment