The Professor’s
dilemma
An interesting note in a later
edition of a biography of Maïtre Philippe by Papus’ son Philippe Encausse
contains an account of an attempted validation of a miraculous healing. It
involved three doctors – a Professor Brouardel
and Drs. Emmanuel Lalande and Gérard Encausse.
“The commission
went to the house in la rue Tête d’Or where the thaumaturge worked, where there
was the usual crowd. Professor Brouardel introduced himself and said:
‘It appears
that you perform miracles sir. Well here we are, two colleagues and myself,
ready to witness the fact...’
Philippe
shrugged his shoulders. This kind of demonstration did not greatly interest him,
but he agreed to do what they asked. He indicated the sick who were present and
said ‘Choose any one you like...’
The commission
put on the rostrum an enormous hydroptic who appeared to be at her last
extremity. Her legs were like pillars, her torso like a tower and her arms like
prize marrows, the whole on the point of bursting.
‘Can you see her all right’ Philippe asked the commission.
On their assent
he said ‘There you are. It’s done!’
Her skirt had
fallen around her ankles and there she stood, acutely embarrassed but thin and
cured. There was not a single drop of liquid on the platform or anywhere else.
A miracle? There was no other word for it. A miracle in all its
incomprehensible simplicity.
Doctors
Encausse and Lalande began to prepare a
statement on how they had examined the patient before and after, not taken their
eyes off her for a second, and had witnessed her cure, of a kind that was not
unusual where Monsieur Philippe was concerned. Both signed, but Professor Brouardel,
without denying what he had seen (which would have been difficult in the
circumstances!) refused to add his signature on the grounds that ‘he could not
understand what had happened...’
With attitudes such as this, it is
hardly surprising that Monsieur Philippe found it difficult to obtain any official recognition of his powers.
Although it should be said that Professor Brouardel had put himself into a vulnerable
position in even agreeing to take part in this event, in that both his medical
colleagues were committed supporters of Monsieur Philippe, so it is doubtful if
much official credence would have been granted to their evidence even if the Professor
had signed the document with his own blood! Whatever the witness of the
‘unqualified’ crowd who had gathered there, to say nothing of the patient
herself.
Apart from Dr. Encausse’s track
record as an occult populariser, Dr Lalande was a close relative of Monsieur
Philippe, having married his daughter Victoire. Born at the end of 1868 he had turned
up in Paris as a medical student in 1887 and become a member of Papus’ circle, choosing the pen name of Marc
Haven from the same source as Papus, the Nuctemeron of Apollonius of Tyana as
quoted by Eliphas Levi (Haven being the name of the spirit of Dignity – or,
perhaps better – ‘gravitas’.) Papus encouraged him to develop an
interest in homeopathy and alchemy and in 1893 he became a member of the
supreme council of the Ordre Kabbalistique de la Rose+Croix. He qualified as a
doctor of medicine in 1896 with a treatise on the unlikely subject of the medieval
alchemical doctor Arnaud de Villeneuve.
He had even met Maïtre Philippe a
little before Papus, who before venturing to Lyons himself to meet his recent
apparent inner plane antagonist, {see Sons of Hermes 22}, asked Emmanuel
Lalande to go down first and report back. Which his young colleague did – an event
that completely changed his life!
By September 1897 he had married
Philippe’s daughter Victoire and found a position specialising in homeopathy at
a local hospital. Then, as a family member, well qualified medically and
esoterically, he formed a close partnership with Monsieur Philippe in his
pharmacological enterprises, not only in their research and manufacture but
their commercial exploitation.
It has to be said that he seemed
somewhat bewildered by all this at first. In a letter to Papus he describes how
the programme of laboratory work, even with a couple of assistants, was very
hard, neither a bed of roses nor a sinecure. It was impossible to distinguish
between good or bad results, and he just had to hope that he did not appear too
much like an ignorant pig. “Beyond which, embracing buddhism, catholicism,
anticlericalism, or christianity appears like a comedy of bumbling ignorance!”
An official report of one of their
places of work describes a vast room, or laboratory, divided in two by a brick
wall, in which, along with other bizarre or disparate objects were to be found a vast furnace, alembics, retorts, carboys
half filled with an unknown liquid, an electric grinder to reduce horns of cattle,
bones, etc. to powder, from which a liquor called ‘heliozine’ was prepared,
regarded by Philippe as an infallible panacea – especially against syphilis. It
was also called ‘keratine serum’ and contained what he saw as “the angel who
fought against major illnesses.”
Whether he invented it or followed
an ancient recipe is not known but it involved at times someone watching day
and night over an immense autoclave (a device for steam sterilisation at high
temperatures and pressures). Some scattered details of this work are given in Lumière
blanche (White Light) the memoirs of Marie Lalande – Marc Haven’s second
wife after the death of Victoire in 1904. And Haven once remarked that success
in preparation may well have required Monsieur Philippe’s personal involvement
at some point.
Apart from this Maïtre Philippe
continued with his apparently miraculous healing work, which could, on
occasion, include local control of the weather! Unexplainable in scientific terms it may have
been, but it also put into the shade anything produced by the magical
fraternity. Who seemed to take it all in good part however! It even pushed
them, in various degrees, some completely, towards a mystical rather than a magical
approach to spiritual dynamics.
We find therefore a strange divide
in the approach, attitude and methods of Maïtre Philippe. On the one hand
demanding a detailed scientific process and the other an uncompromising religious faith. It is hardly any wonder that
both scientific and esoteric worlds found it difficult to cope with him.
Marc Haven later wrote a book that
compared him to the 18th century wonder worker Count Cagliostro: Le
Maïtre Inconnu Cagliostro (The Unknown Master Cagliostro), sub-titled “an
historical and critical study of High Magic,” seeking why each was regarded either
as an anarchic charlatan or as divinely ordained and inspired. A recent work in
English also worthy of mention is The Masonic Magician – the Life and Death
of Count Cagliostro and his Egyptian Rite, by Philippa Faulks and Robert L.
D. Cooper. (Watkins, 2008).
No comments:
Post a Comment